When we began our peer reviews we chose to have the readers begin without giving a brief summary. I feel this worked fine because they were focused on reading it themselves, rather than giving them an idea of what we were trying to describe to them. This benefited us because if there was something unclear we would have to ask one another. In return it would give us an idea of what we need to go back and fix.
Based on the way we started our reviews, when we began reading with an open mind to what they were writing about. This gave us an edge when offering suggestions. For example, the introduction of one of the papers had some details that were not particularly relevant to his scene. I then discussed with him on a better way to describe what he first saw when attending his event.Overall the peer review went well. I received some advice to better my paper and I was able to help out a couple classmates with theirs.
No comments:
Post a Comment